![]() Index at the top, then a brief metadata box and the annotations at the bottom, grouped by headings so you can collapse them. You can find the new version here: obsidian-templates/zotero.md at main I just wanted to let you know that I’ve completely updated my template, merged annotations and notes back together into one big literature note, and have moved it into a template repository. Wow, I just wanted to write a quick response and figure things out later, but it looks like writing that quick response made me figure stuff out. In fact, yes, I think that’s actually the way to go, because that way I can make sure that only annotations in a certain colour will be turned into notes, or, even better: only the ones that have comments. Or perhaps it is easier to adjust the Zotero integration template so that it adds a heading before each annotation (which the is what the Zettelizer macro uses to extract notes)? If anybody has adapted the zettelizer macro to turn each bullet point into a separate note (see here), please post it here! Just wanted to highlight the ingenuity of this solution. Okay, think I’ll stop my thinking-out-loud here. This is something I do quite often when going through my annotations, to make it easier to quickly grasp the core point of the highlight. Not sure I want to add another plugin, though,… Another disadvantage of highlighting all the highlights in obsidian (regardless of colour) is that I can’t highlight parts of the highlight later in. Unfortunately, Obsidian doesn’t support multiple highlighting colours, but I found the highlightr plugin which adds exactly that. Currently, I have the callouts in the same colour as the original highlights, which helps for recognition. The only thing I’ll have to think about before adopting this template are the colours. Including the ingenious idea with the todo items! But when you bring it into Obsidian (which is primarily about your own thinking) that comment becomes the primary thing and the text that triggered it is added for context.Īnd the bullet list format is much easier to handle than the callout format I’ve been using so far. Nice! Now that I see it, the reversion of importance, if I can call it that, makes total sense: in the source, your comment is secondary in the sense that it is a comment triggered by something in the text. Comments are listed in bold before the highlight they belong to
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |